fountain-bonig logo

specialist lawyers focused

adelaide south australia

  • About us
    • Some background about us
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our Senior Lawyers
      • John Fountain
      • Ralph Bönig
      • John Homburg
      • David Rostron
    • About our website
  • Areas of Law
    • General Insurance
      • Overview of General Insurance
      • Personal Injury Claims Overview
      • Prescribed sums (Non-economic loss under CLA)
        • 2009
        • 2008
        • 2007
        • 2006
        • 2005
        • 2004
        • 2003
        • 2002
      • Topical Issues and Decisions
      • Papers
        • How compensation is calculated for catastrophic claims and where the money goes.
    • Medical Malpractice
      • Overview of Medical Malpractice
      • Topical Issues and Decisions
      • Papers
        • How compensation is calculated for catastrophic claims and where the money goes.
        • Recent Changes in Medical Negligence – Adverse Events and the Coroner
    • OH&S
      • Overview
      • Table summarising obligations and penalties for breaches of general provisions
      • Topical issues and decisions
        • Prosecutions under the Act
        • Selected case summaries
          • 2008
          • 2007
          • 2006
          • 2005
          • 2004
          • 2003
          • 2002
          • 2001
          • 2000
      • Papers
        • Contracting and Occupational Health and Safety: Employers, Contractors and Occupational Health and Safety Liability; Seminal and Recent Decisions
    • Professional Indemnity
      • Overview Of Professional Indemnity
      • Topical Issues and Decisions
    • Workers Compensation
      • Detailed Overview of the Workers Compensation Scheme in South Australia
      • Topical issues and decisions
      • Prescribed sums
        • Ready Reckoner of Selected Prescribed Sums
      • Papers
        • Costs in the SA Workers Compensation Tribunal (and other Cost Related Issues) (October 2005)
        • “Stress” Claims: Interpreting Section 30A of the South Australian Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1986
  • News and Views
  • Resolving Disputes
    • Overview – There is always a sensible solution for any problem
    • ADR
    • SA Common Law Civil jurisdiction
    • New Rules of Court for South Australia – Supreme and District Court Civil Rules 2006
    • Courts’ Timetables
      • Supreme Court and District Court
      • Magistrates Court
    • Legislative reform summary – personal injury overview
      • Personal Injury Claims Overview
    • Experts
      • Summary of Supreme Court Rule 160 – Expert Reports
      • The Full Text of Supreme Court Rules 2006 (SA) – Expert Reports – Rule 160
      • Summary of Supreme Court Rule 161 – Shadow Experts
      • Full text of Supreme Court Rules 2006 (SA) – Shadow Experts – Rule 161
      • Summary and full text of 2006 Practice Direction 5.4
      • Former 1987 Rules
        • Summary of Supreme Court Rule 38 – Expert Reports
        • Full Text of Rule 38 – Supreme Court Rules 1987 (SA) – Expert Reports
        • Summary and full text of 1987 Practice direction 46
    • Costs
      • Effective use of the Costs Rules in South Australian Civil Courts
      • Calderbank Offers in South Australia
      • Rules of Court Offers in Multi-Party Actions (August 2007)
    • Extensions of time
  • Our Cases
  • Careers
    • Employment
  • Contact
    • Feedback
You are here: Our Cases

Our Cases

 

Levy Review Panel Overturns WorkCover’s Imposition of Supplementary Levy for the Employer’s Alleged Failure to provide Suitable Duties (May 2009)
Compensation fraud is simply not worth the risk! (March 2008)
Full Supreme Court Quashes Minister’s Decision
Employing less than 200 workers is not a bar to renewing exempt status
TXU v Minister for Industrial Relations [2005] SASC 490
Order for indemnity costs against worker in vexatious claims
Kowalski v Mitsubishi Australia Ltd [2003] SAWCT 48
SA Workers Compensation Tribunal
Controlling Vexatious Litigants
Kowalski v Mitsubishi Motors Australia [2004] SAWCT 24
SA Workers Compensation Tribunal
Damages Claim Against Nursing Home Dismissed
Chan v Barter (trading as Pembroke Nursing Home) [2003] SADC 5
South Australian District Court
Workers Compensation Fraud (Civil)
Workers Compensation Tribunal upholds Mitsubishi’s application for summary judgment
Dolling v Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd [2004] SAWCT 22
Section 36(4) does not apply to section 38A and section 39 reductions
G H Michell & Sons (Australia) Pty Ltd v Golding [2003] SAWCT 13
SA Workers Compensation Tribunal
Workers Compensation Fraud – Supreme Court dismisses Worker’s appeal against conviction
Dolling v Waite [2003] SASC 400
Medical Malpractice
The Delivery of Bad News is an Unenviable Task, But Should an Adverse Reaction Give Rise to a Valid Claim for Negligence?
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap

Website created by glasscube designs logo